🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire them for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.